Special: Trot's Day Off: Lincoln Review

I am introducing a new section of Trot's Cap, entitled "Trot's Day Off." The idea here is that posts under the title "Trot's Day Off" will be unrelated to sports. Much like real athletes, not everything I do pertains to sports. So, here is my first installation of "Trot's Day Off," a review of the Oscar-nominated film, Lincoln. I promise you will disagree with me, and I will happily respond to any comments you have on my review.

And the award for Failing to Meet Expectations goes to...Steven Spielberg and Daniel Day-Lewis, for Lincoln!

Lincoln was one of 2012's most highly anticipated films. Even before it began filming, moviegoers across the globe were salivating at the thought of Spielberg's take on one of America's most beloved presidents, featuring the stellar performance Daniel Day-Lewis – perhaps the most talented actor of the last twenty-five years – was sure to give.

With Spielberg, audiences anticipated the professionalism they have come to expect from the storied director and producer. With Day-Lewis, they expected an incredible performance full of passionate calls-to-arms wrought with emotion. Unfortunately, since its release in November 2012, Lincoln has left much to be desired in those departments.

Spielberg's elder-statesman reputation in the movie industry is well-warranted, but his last two films (Lincoln and War Horse) suggest he doesn't feel the need to try anymore; anything he makes will be considered wonderful and heaps of praise will be thrown at the film, simply because his name is attached to it. Lincoln's direction in Lincoln was fine, but it did not impress, and many scenes didn't have the dramatic impact he would have you think, such as the burning of an unspecified city after Lincoln said that there was no peace treaty from the Confederacy.

Day-Lewis's career connotes nothing less than astounding, heart-felt representations of historical characters, but Abraham Lincoln is not given the same justice that Christy Brown and Bill the Butcher were. Day-Lewis was not impressive, but his name alone carried him back into conversations of best acting performances of the year.

The award shows seem to have neglected to actually watch the film, and automatically nominated and awarded Day-Lewis the award for Best Actor: so far, he has won Best Actor for Lincoln 16 times. Day-Lewis is without doubt an incredible actor, but he only proved that twice in Lincoln: in his “human dignity” speech, and when arguing with Mary Todd Lincoln (Sally Field) about Robert enlisting, in which Fields puts on the better performance.

Lincoln dragged on for far too long, and snuck in the presidents' assassination as an afterthought. The historical accuracy – something that should always be questioned in historical films – was a bit off. From the boisterously full House of Representatives during an era when half the country was not part of the country, to the touching introduction and celebration of African-Americans sitting in on the 13^th Amendment vote after the film spent two hours showing Mary Todd Lincoln's African-American servant present for the entirety of the House proceedings, this historical drama was dripping with inaccuracies and inconsistencies.

Lincoln was supposed to be Oscar-bait, and with the 12 nominations the film has garnered, it has fulfilled expectations. Whether or not these nominations are earned, or if they were just born out of the preconceived notions of the talent of Spielberg and Day-Lewis is another question altogether.